As software vendors, we’re always claiming our Solutions deliver value for money, excellent Return on Investment and generally deliver a more efficient, pleasant life.
Prospective customers are understandably more cautious. It is important to access your recruitment management system options carefully before committing to implementing any new tool. Especially solutions involving Talent Management and Acquisition. Plus, it is fundamental to be conscious of the type of brand experience your hiring, onboarding and general People Management processes offer.
However, not all Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) are the same. Forget the monstrous enterprise versions. In this context, we’re only talking about small businesses, SMEs and agile companies.
Sizing up an ATS usually involves some Cost Benefit Analysis.
‘What’s the upside of deploying a system like this?’
‘What are the downsides and risks?’
‘What do we stand to lose if we don’t?
If looking at ATSs, you should start by adding up what you’re paying now. No, not just the obvious recruiters’ fees (15% of annual salary) and job board ads or admin costs in terms of time spent. But the cost of missing out on the right people to achieve your organisational goals without losing them to the competition.
Look how much an ATS for small businesses costs and you’ll see instant ROI!
If you’re a small, agile, growing business, where roles are often shared – for example, where operations or admin or Owner Managers are responsible for hiring and ‘HR’ – then you’ll need help from a dedicated application more than a professional.
Sorting, shortlisting and responding to candidates is also particularly time-consuming. Ask your team if you don’t already know this. Plus, you need a consistent standard of on-brand, timely and well-pitched messages to advise candidates if they’re successful or not at each stage of the process.
You might also like to analyse the typical lifecycle of a new vacancy to refine your process from the creation of the job description, output of the ad, shortlisting and interviewing through to the final appointment and onboarding. (Will your solution integrate with a wider HR system at this stage?)
We call systems that do all of this ‘end-to-end recruitment software.
Reporting insights will illustrate what you need to adjust in your pitch, process – and the personnel responsible for recruitment.
But the most important thing, ironically, about automation in this context is the opportunity to deliver a more human experience when there are finally person-to-person interactions and to be more proactive about sourcing candidates Surely that’s what the best talent expects!